How to Win Funds and Modernize Technology

Federal Computer Week

By Derek B. Johnson
September 13, 2018

Congress will soon decide whether to add more dollars to the Technology Modernization Fund next year, but the board in charge of making awards has learned plenty of lessons in its first year of operations.

At a Sept. 13 luncheon hosted by AFFIRM, members of the board reflected on their first year of operations and agencies alterations to their proposals to modernization. They also discussed how the board's dealings with federal agencies and Congress on the first set of awards has impacted future rounds of consideration.

Alan Thomas, a TMF board member and commissioner of the Federal Acquisition Service at the General Services Administration, said one of the biggest lessons he tried to impart to agencies after the first round of proposals came in was "don't wait to tell us the good stuff."

"Right away, get to the impact of your project, what's the outcome?" Thomas said. "It's always amazing to me how people will write two to three pages down … and at the last paragraph they've got the sentence buried in there, the 'Aha!' Don't make the board search hard for that stuff, put it right up front."

The board announced the first round of awards in June, doling out $45 million to the Departments of Agriculture, Energy and Housing and Urban Development. Each project -- a customer experience portal, email cloud migration and mainframe application migration respectively -- was picked in part to serve as a model for other government agencies.

Elizabeth Cain, executive director of the TMF board, said that with a limited amount of money, the board considers not just whether a project will improve mission delivery or contain the right details for paying back award funds, but also whether the agency has demonstrated that it can't fund the project through other means.

"We definitely want to make sure when people come [with pitch proposals] that this is the best solution for funding their project," Cain said. "We want to know what other avenues they've investigated."

Maria Roat, another board member and CIO for the Small Business Administration, said the board has "sent some proposals back because we felt the agencies could self-fund what they were requesting."

While the TMF has broad bipartisan support in Congress, funding for next year has been thrown into jeopardy as lawmakers complained that the board and the Office of Management and Budget were not providing enough transparency around how projects are selected and how the board operates. In public and in private, board members have expressed confidence that OMB and Federal CIO Suzette Kent are actively addressing those concerns.

"In terms of Suzette's [communications] on the Hill, she's gone up and told them just about anything they want to know about the fund, how it's operating, what we're doing, what we're focused on," said Thomas. "In my estimation, we've done all we could in that area without launching every board member out to talk to every individual member [of Congress]."

Thomas also said that the board "did not take into account whether or not we were going to get another tranche of money" next year and that members are solely focused on doling out the remaining $55 million still on hand to the most deserving agencies.

Spokespersons for the House and Senate Appropriations Committees told FCW that lawmakers are still negotiating a final agreement on the General Government Appropriations bill that houses the TMF. A staffer on the Senate side said it will likely take at least a few more days to reach an agreement. 

The board has also faced pushback from agencies on what they perceive as overly restrictive rules around repayment. Members of Congress have stressed that the repayment plan is critical to the long-term success of TMF, with Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) saying that the money "is not a slush fund" and that agencies must use savings to help seed future modernization efforts.

At a Sept. 13 roundtable on technology modernization hosted by FCW, one senior IT leader in a cabinet-level agency said his chief financial officer was strongly opposed to the use of TMF funds because of the aggressive payback schedule. The worry is that if savings from IT modernization fail to materialize, the money to pay back the central fund will have to come from program budgets. Many other CIOs at the event (which was on-the-record but not for attribution) cited this as a key flaw in the current TMF structure.

That dynamic could explain why the board has not seen as many agencies submitting proposals as initially expected.

"I think when TMF fund awards were announced, we all expected a barrage of proposals coming in, and we've gotten a lot of proposals, but I've been surprised at how many agencies did not apply," said Mark Kneidinger, a member of the board and deputy director for the National Risk Management Center at the Department of Homeland Security.

Click here for the original article.

TMF Board Focused on New Projects While Congress Weighs Funding

Fedscoop
By Carteen Cordell
September 13, 2018

Even though the House and Senate haven’t decided whether they’ll provide more money for the government’s Technology Modernization Fund in fiscal 2019, Alan Thomas said he and the TMF Board are still busy looking for its next projects.

“There’s a pipeline of existing projects that we’re looking at. You’ll be hearing about some decisions soon,” the Federal Acquisition Service commissioner said at an AFFIRM event Thursday discussing the fund. “We did not take into account whether we were going to get another tranche of money.”

The fiscal 2019 budget for TMF, which offers financing for agency IT modernization projects on a revolving basis, has been a question mark since August, when the Senate voted not to include the fund in its appropriations bill, citing a lack of information from agencies on why more funding is needed.

Because the House version of the bill included $150 million in funding, both appropriations committees sought to craft a negotiated bill in conference Thursday, leaving the possibility that TMF could still receive at least some appropriations when fiscal 2019 begins Oct. 1.

Thomas, a member of the TMF Board that determines which agency projects receive funding, said that because agencies are expected to pay back any funds received within five years of award, the board will continue to evaluate proposals, congressional funding or not.

“One of the key things we’re looking at for projects is the ability to pay back,” he said. “We haven’t had a single discussion about, ‘Hey, what about the next tranche of money?’ We’re solely focused on a pipeline of projects and the merit of those projects.”

Headed by a seven-member board that includes Federal CIO Suzette Kent, the TMF was established with $100 million initial funding passed in March as part of a fiscal 2018 omnibus package. In June, the fund awarded $45 million to the departments of Agriculture, Energy and Housing and Urban Development for modernization projects.

The initial installments of those awards began dispersing in the past month-and-a-half, said Elizabeth Cain, executive director of the TMF Program Management Office. Agencies have one year to make their first repayment installation, or six months after the completion of their project.

That means even without congressional appropriations, the fund should be able to sustain itself as agencies begin to pay it back.

But given the fund’s integral role in the administration’s IT modernization efforts, working with Congress will be essential to the long-term success of the TMF.

Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., said last month that officials didn’t provide enough information about the program’s positive results and return on investment to justify more funding.

“I wasn’t going to allocate $210 million to something that we don’t know that it’s working,” he said.

Thomas said that while Kent continued to work with Congress as the TMF Board’s representative, the modernization projects underway need time to develop before showing such results.

“It’s just a tad premature to talk about ROI, because we just funded three projects that are about half the fund,” he said. “I think those kinds of metrics, like ROI, you see over the next 12 months. Let’s see how those projects perform.”

Click here for the original article.

Lawmakers Have One More Shot To Raise Modernization Fund Ceiling

Nextgov
By Aaron Boyd
September 13, 2018

As the 2019 appropriations process wraps up, lawmakers will have one last chance to add money to the Technology Modernization Fund or effectively cap it at 2018 levels.

Congressional appropriators from the House and Senate met Thursday to conference on the Financial Services and General Government minibus spending package, which covers a number of agencies and programs, including the TMF, managed by the Office of Management and Budget and the General Services Administration. The House-passed version of the bill included an additional $150 million. But Senate appropriators zeroed out the line item, citing a lack of transparency from the administration.

“We have not seen results on that program yet and we don’t have any data on it,” Senate Appropriations Committee member James Lankford, R-Okla., said July 31 during floor debate on his chamber’s version of the bill.

Congressional watchers were expecting the conference committee to come to an agreement on the Financial Services minibus Thursday but no announcement had been made as legislative work wrapped. Lawmakers will be off for a week, with the next vote scheduled for Sept. 25.

The last-minute allocation is key for the fund, as the Modernizing Government Technology Act only allowed for appropriations in the 2018 and 2019 budgets. No additional funding would cap the revolving fund at $100 million in the absence of new legislation.

The TMF Board has already awarded $45 million to three projects, all of which have received the funding and are in the process of beginning their IT modernization projects. The three agencies—the Energy, Agriculture and Housing and Urban Development departments—now have five years to pay back the fund.

The board currently has “about a dozen” proposals on its table at varying levels of review, according to Elizabeth Cain, acting executive director of the TMF program management office based out of GSA.

“We have a bunch of proposals that are in various stages of review right now, in both the pre-submittal phase and the full project proposal phase,” Cain said during a Nextgov webcast Wednesday.

“We’ve got a busy fall,” she said, adding the next set of awards “should be in the near-term but not too near-term.”

More For Your Money

The board members aren’t just buying better IT for select federal agencies; they’re also buying experience, which will be presented in the form of modernization playbooks.

“Each of the teams that received the award, in addition to the funding they have a solemn duty to get back to the rest of the community with their lessons learned and inform the larger playbook,” Cain said Thursday at a lunch hosted by the Association For Federal Information Resources Management, or AFFIRM.

She cited Energy’s consolidation to a single cloud email platform—which will add more context to a well-worn path in modernization—and Housing and Urban Development’s mainframe migration—which will include the difficult task of moving from decades-old Cobol coding language to something modern.

For Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner and board member Alan Thomas, the playbooks are a central value-add.

“We’re looking to create models—100 million bucks is not enough to modernize the federal government,” he said Thursday. “But we are looking for models that we can show and highlight and other agencies can say, ‘Ah, OK, I see how to do this,’ or, ‘I see a path to do this,’ and then get some additional benefit beyond the $100 million we have.”

Click here for the original article.

Technology Modernization Board to Stay the Course Regardless of Funding

Federal Times
By Jesse Bur
September 13, 2018

Though fiscal year 2019 appropriations for the Technology Modernization Fund are not a guarantee, the board that manages the funds intends to keep moving forward with its planned awards, according to Alan Thomas, commissioner for the Federal Acquisition Service and Technology Modernization Board member.

“We have not had a single discussion at the board meeting about, ‘Hey, what about the next tranche of money?’” said Thomas at a Sept. 13 Association for Federal Information Resource Management event.

“There’s a pipeline of existing projects that we’ve been looking at. You’ll be hearing about some decisions soon. We did not take into account whether we were going to get another tranche of money in there. One of the key things that we’re looking at for projects is the ability to pay back, so there’s a revolving fund.”

The TMF was originally awarded $100 million in FY18 appropriations, less than half of the $250 million that the original legislation establishing the fund called for.

And while House appropriations attempted to make up that difference with $150 million for FY19, members of the Senate said that they were unwilling to allocate more money until the fund had shown some results. That’s a tall order for a program that awarded its first grants only in June 2018.

According to Elizabeth Cain, acting executive director of the Technology Modernization Fund Program Management Office at the General Services Administration, the first TMF funding transfers to agency accounts only occurred within the last month and a half.

“It’s just a tad premature to talk about [return on investment], because we literally just funded three projects that are about half the fund. We have another set of projects that we’re getting ready to fund, and some things in the pipeline,” said Thomas.

“So I think those kinds of metrics, like ROI, you’ll start to see over the next 12 months. Let’s see how those projects perform.”

The board initially awarded $45 million to the Departments of Energy, Housing and Urban Development, and Agriculture, leaving just over half for future projects.

And though the funding is designed to be repaid as agencies reap the benefits of newly modernized IT, agencies that received the first awards aren’t scheduled to fully pay back the funding for five years.

According to Maria Roat, chief information officer for the Small Business Administration and TMB member, the second round of proposals has proven more mature than the first, largely because agencies have learned from the first round how to better put together proposal documents and pitches to the TMB.

Still, some agencies have requested large sums of money for upcoming projects, that would wipe out the fund in one fell swoop.

“We did have one that came in for a big chunk of change, and we went back to them and said, ‘We’re going to fund up to this. You show us that you met this and then we’ll give you the next tranche,'” said Roat.

She added that some proposals are also sent back to agencies, because they can be funded with existing appropriations within that agency.

Congress is scheduled to vote Sept. 13 on a general government appropriations bill that could or could not include additional funding for TMF.

Click here for the original article.

First TMF Funding Disbursed; Remaining Funds Won’t Disappear

MeriTalks
September 13, 2018

Members of the Technology Modernization Fund (TMF) board and the fund’s executive director today provided a wide range of TMF updates regarding funding and coordination with lawmakers, on the same day that House and Senate conferees met to reconcile differences in appropriations bills that will ultimately decide the fund’s spending power for FY 2019.

The TMF officials discussed those topics as part of a panel discussion organized by the Association for Federal Information Resources Management, and indicated that as the final funding hour for the next fiscal year draws near, it’s not all doom and gloom. Here’s why.

When the Clock Strikes Midnight

TMF’s funding approved by Congress for FY 2018 won’t be disappearing. The end of this month marks the end of the Federal government’s fiscal year, but it won’t spell the end for the $55 million remaining in FY 2018 TMF funding, out of the $100 million total appropriated by Congress last year.

“It doesn’t turn into a pumpkin on September 30,” joked TMF Executive Director Elizabeth Cain today.

She said Wednesday that roughly a dozen projects remained in the TMF pipeline, adding that awards could be coming soon, without committing to a date.

It appears that the TMF board will have more time to find projects deemed worthy, as the current funding is not subject to a “use-it-or-lose-it” policy by the end of FY 2018.

For Those Who’ve Already Made the Cut

The check is in the mail. Cain relayed her excitement that–over roughly the past month and half–the first disbursements of TMF funding have gone out to the Departments of Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, and Energy.

“We effected the first transfers to all three of the awarded agencies, so they’ve gotten their first incremental funding amount. It’s in their account and they’re on their acquisition right now to get started on their projects,” Cain said.

This doesn’t mean that the three agencies now have all $45 million in total awards lining their pockets. HUD received an initial $5 million transfer, DoE roughly $2.26 million, and USDA $4 million.

TMF disbursements, as the board’s representatives and award winners have explained, are part of a benchmarked process in which agencies will have to demonstrate progress against established milestones for their projects before more funding is doled out.

What They’re Telling Congress

We’ve got one message. Given calls from the Senate for more transparency over the TMF process before they decide to fund the TMF next year, the panelists explained that they’re presenting a unified front, with Federal CIO Suzette Kent as the sole point of contact.

“I think it’s always important to communicate with one voice to the Congress,” said Alan Thomas, commissioner of the General Service Administration’s Federal Acquisition Service and a TMF board member. “From a board perspective, individual members have not been running off and talking to Congress. Suzette’s the point person. She’s the chair of the board. She’s a great leader, and a good communicator, and she’s been the conduit to work with the Congress.”

He suggested that the board isn’t pulling any punches, and that Kent is open to relaying any informationCongress needs to make its decision.

“In terms of Suzette’s comms with the Hill, I think she’s gone up and told them just about anything they want to know about the fund and how it’s operating,” Thomas said.

While the board says it remains transparent about the process, Thomas pushed back against suggestions that Congress should be seeing the fund demonstrating tangible returns at this early stage.

“It’s just a tad premature to talk about ROI [return on investment],” he said. “I think those kind of metrics like ROI, you start to see over the next 12 months. Let’s see how those projects perform.”

Click here for the original article.

AFFIRM Approved as Registered Education Provider by Project Management Institute

AFFIRM has announced its selection as a Registered Education Provider (R.E.P.) for the Project Management Institute (PMI), the world’s largest project management member association. The selection became effective August 1, 2018. R.E.P.s are specially selected organizations approved to help project managers achieve and maintain the Project Management Professional (PMP)®, Program Management Professional (PgMP)® and other PMI professional credentials. These organizations have met PMI’s rigorous quality criteria for course content, instructor qualification, and instructional design.

Professional certification is important to the project manager career field which now has global median salaries that exceed $81,000 (USD). Designated R.E.M.s are critical to obtaining and maintaining those certifications and AFFIRM will now be an educational resource for PMI professionals.

“AFFIRM is honored to be selected as a PMI R.E.P. and is eager to assist project managers in the Washington DC area in achieving and maintaining their certifications,” said Adrian Gardner, President of AFFIRM. “Our educational forums bring senior leadership from across government to encourage innovation, modernization, and effective technology management across the federal government.”

AFFIRM joins more than 1,500 R.E.P.s in more than 80 countries. These organizations include commercial training providers, academic institutions, and corporate training departments within corporations and government agencies.

Project Management Institute is the world's leading not-for-profit professional membership association for the project, program and portfolio management professions. Founded in 1969, PMI delivers value for more than 2.9 million professionals working in nearly every country in the world through global advocacy, collaboration, education and research. PMI advances careers, improves organizational success and further matures the profession of project management through its globally recognized standards, certifications, resources, tools academic research, publications, professional development courses, and networking opportunities.

Early returns on GSA’s EIS contract, IT modernization is not in play

Federal News Radio
Jason Miller
August 27, 2018

The idea of iterative or agile development hasn’t quite come to the Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) contract.

If the initial handful of fair opportunity soliticiations are any indication of what’s to come, the pressure on agencies to transition to the new $50 billion telecommunications contract run by the General Services Administration by May 2020 is pushing them to take a “winner take all” approach.

And industry experts say that approach likely means the Trump administration’s goal of using EIS to jumpstart IT modernization efforts will be overlooked.

Diana Gowen, general manager and senior vice president for MetTel’s federal program, said based on what she’s seen from the three solicitations so far, agencies are mostly taking a “like-for-like approach and asking vendors to tell them how they would modernize in order to get going. It’s not unlike Networx. So despite OMB pushing and all that stuff, it looks like same old same old, which is unfortunate.”

Denny Groh, executive director for corporate relations for Accelera Solutions, an IT services firm, and a former GSA executive who managed the FTS 2000 and FTS 2001 long distance contracts before retiring in 2003, said while agencies may be motivated to transform through EIS, he estimates less than one-third will actually do anything different.

“A lot of agencies don’t necessarily have all the buy-in of their sub entities and that makes it tough to get a unified front to figure out what they have and what they will do,” he said. “Many will do like-for-like, or they are going to transform in some moderate way.”

Both Groh and Gowen pointed to the three fair opportunity solicitations that are out today as an initial small sample size of the direction EIS may be heading.

The departments of Labor and Justice are among the first out of the gate and both solicitations are taking the “winner take all” approach for voice, video and data.

Justice is taking an interesting approach, Gowen said. The agency issued one solicitation, but it has three sections: one for the FBI’s voice and data where the vendor needs a top secret facility clearance, one for just the Bureau of Prisons telecommunications needs and finally one for the rest of DoJ. Vendors can bid on all three or any combination of the three.

The Social Security Administration, which was the first agency to release its request for proposal, wasn’t much better, looking for a vendor to provide data and voice services, which accounts for a majority of the agency’s needs.

The fact that these agencies seemingly are not transforming or modernizing through EIS doesn’t bode well for GSA’s situation that is getting tougher by the month. The Networx contract ends in May 2020 and GSA has said many times it doesn’t want to extend the contract so agencies have to get their transitions done.

Kay Ely, GSA’s assistant commissioner for the Office of Information Technology Category (ITC) in the Federal Acquisition Service, opened the door slightly to an extension saying in July that if agencies can show they are transforming more than transitioning to EIS, then an extension may be possible.

“If an agency says all I can do between now and May 2020 is like-for-like, then extensions are off the table,” Ely said at an AFFIRM event on July 26. “But if they are doing a hybrid or partial transformation and there is only so much work that can be done, we know in the back of our minds an extension is still out there. But agencies need to put all their efforts into transformation.”

But Groh Gowen and others say an extension is all but assured.

As of Aug. 8, GSA reported four of nine EIS vendors have completed the business support systems testing, and all nine contractors will not be done until early November at the soonest.

After the BSS functional testing, all vendors’ systems must go through the final security approval process.

“GSA is now beginning to be concerned about how get everyone through that authority to operate (ATO) hurdle. They are thinking about how do they expedite this ATO process,” Gowen said. “One of the things that has been suggested is for those awardees who want to work on sprint can nominate themselves to get to the FISMA moderate accreditation faster. We certainly would raise our hands.”

Gowen said given the timeline of vendors not getting ATOs until the spring, GSA likely will have little choice but to extend Networx.

“As we are working with agencies we suggest, as they craft proposals, that they factor in whether all of their modernization goals are achievable within the targeted transition timelines. Timeframes are going to be aggressive,” said a Verizon spokeswoman by email. “When agencies are making their decisions, they should consider past performance to determine if the vendor they are selecting is capable of executing on an aggressive transition. Agencies must balance the urgency of transition with the necessity of modernization.”

The Interior Department may be one of the IT modernization outliers under EIS.

Tim Quinn, Interior’s chief of enterprises infrastructure, said at the Network Modernization Forum in June sponsored by ACT-IAC, that the agency started discussing what transformation would look liked under EIS more than a year ago.

“Go big means citizen delivery,” Quinn said. “If we have better, more complete big data driven, high performance computing heavy model driven interoperability between what USGS does with ground water and surface water with what NOAA does with its weather models, we can get much better predictions of things like [the flooding] in Ellicott City, Maryland. So when I talk about going big with EIS ,in order to do those things I have to be prepared to deliver 100,000 sensors over the next few years. So going big is putting your business first.”

Quinn said Interior is looking for technology that industry may not be ready for today but since EIS is a 15-year contract there are a lot of possibilities on the horizon.

“We have tremendous change capacity built into the contract. I can write and award a new fair opportunity a year later,” he said. “We continue to write fair opportunities under Networx. We made changes along the way. One we did was a broadband fair opportunity through Networx and brought in a technology we didn’t even think about when we started Networx. I think it’s been a good thing for both Interior and government.”

Quinn said that approach is the future of EIS as well where agencies can bring on new technologies as they are ready.

“We want to get off Networx as fast as humanely possible, but we also want to change as fast as possible,” he said. “I have customers who view me as a dinosaur. We are behind and we need to be innovative so we need to partner with everybody to help each other get there faster.”

Gary Hall,  the director of strategy, planning and operations at Cisco, said transformation for many agencies doesn’t have to mean a full scale revolution, but more of an evolution.

“They should transform themselves from a perspective of providing operations and maintenance of on-premise gear to brokering the services they need, however they need whether on-premise or in the cloud,” Hall said.

GSA Losing 3 Acquisition, Technology Leaders

Federal News Radio
Jason Miller
August 13, 2018

The General Services Administration’s Federal Acquisition Service is seeing a lot of movement in its executive ranks. Three key leaders announced they were leaving the agency, including Kay Ely, the assistant commissioner for the IT category.

Federal News Radio has confirmed that Ely announced her plans to retire by Dec. 31 after taking a 90-day detail to work on the GSA-Office of Personnel Management merger. Ely will leave her assistant commissioner role on Sept. 30 to go on the detail and work with the interagency task force.

Ely worked at OPM for five years before coming to GSA in 2011.

GSA’s Kay Ely speaking during an interview at Federal News Radio.

Sources say it’s unclear who will replace Ely on an interim basis with leading candidates expected to be Keith Nakasone, the deputy assistant commissioner for acquisition, and Bill Zielinski, the deputy assistant commissioner for ITC under Ely.

Along with Ely, Joel Minton, the executive director of the Login.gov program, and David Zvenyach, who was the assistant commissioner for the FAS Office of Systems Management until May when he became a senior advisor, announced their plans to return to the private sector.

Sources say Minton is headed to Google after spending the last two-plus years working for the U.S. Digital Service on the Login.gov program.

Sources confirmed that Alex Dalessio, a Presidential Innovation Fellow since October, will become the new executive director of Login.gov and Eric Mill, a senior adviser at TTS, will be the new deputy director.

Zvenyach sent a note to colleagues Aug. 7 announcing his decision to move on after more than three years at GSA and 10 in public service.

“I’m leaving GSA at the end of the fiscal year to pursue new opportunities outside of government,” Zvenyach wrote in an email obtained by Federal News Radio. “Although I’m happy to talk to you offline about those plans, my immediate plan is to keep running through the tape until my very last day.”

It’s unclear who will replace Zvenyach at this point.

“Six months after I joined 18F in 2015, I wrote that ‘[i]t’s truly hard to explain in this medium how intensely grateful I am that I get to participate in this little government experiment.’ That gratitude never wore off, and it never will,” Zvenyach told colleagues. “In fact, it intensified. Over the years, I’ve had the opportunity to get to know many different parts of GSA. The agency is filled with extraordinary public servants, and I feel so fortunate to have had the privilege to serve alongside each and every one of you. Thank you. Although I’m excited for the new opportunities ahead, and I’m as optimistic as ever about the future of GSA, FAS, OSM, TTS, 18F, and (my first home) AcqStack, my enthusiasm is tempered by the fact that I will miss y’all madly.”

Ely’s decision to retire comes as several important FAS initiatives are getting going, including the transition to the Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) contract, the kick-off of the Alliant 2 governmentwide acquisition service and potential major changes to the schedules program.

She said at an event sponsored by AFFIRM in July that FAS is focused on being more innovative, using emerging technology such as artificial intelligence and distributed ledger to speed up the contract award process.

Zvenyach also is leaving a key time for his project, which is to transform the systems under the Integrated Acquisition Environment (IAE).

GSA recently launched a new beta version of the System for Award Management (SAM), turned off the old Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, moved FedBizOpps.gov to a new hosting environment and enabled login.gov services across SAM.gov.

Minton’s decision to return to the private sector is less surprising. He worked at Intuit, eBay and several other large and small technology companies during his career so returning to the private sector at some time was expected.

He came to federal service to work for USDS on this specific program. Now almost three years later, Login.gov seems to have turned an important corner of getting agencies to use the service. Along with SAM.gov, two other major programs are using Login.gov services, including USAJobs.gov and the Trusted Traveler Program.

Taking Stock: Leading GSA's Federal Acquisition Service into the Future

FCW
Mark Rockwell
July 26, 2018

 Despite some hurdles, Federal Acquisition Service leaders remain confident in their agency's ability to move ahead with its e-commerce portal effort, a $50 billion telecommunications contract and transactional data reporting pilot.

The e-commerce portal plan took a hit when Congress pushed back on a proposal backed by the General Service Administration officials to increase the civilian micro-purchase threshold to $25,000 from $10,000.

The increase would make using e-commerce portals easier and more attractive to federal buyers and a key to the portal initiative, according to GSA.

The request for increase was not included in the final National Defense Authorization Act, although the bill does increase the Defense Department's micro-purchase threshold from $5,000 to $10,000, to match civilian spending authorities.

The agency has been working with Congress on finding ways to increase the micro-purchase limit, FAS Commissioner Alan Thomas, told FCW at an Association for Federal Information Resources Management event on July 26.

The year-old Enterprise Infrastructure Services contract, which faced a sluggish initial reception from federal agency customers, is benefiting from the Trump administration's IT modernization push, according to Thomas and Kay Ely, assistant commissioner, in FAS' Office of IT Category.

"The momentum has changed dramatically" around EIS, said Ely, who was also at the AFFIRM event. More outreach by FAS to federal agencies to help connect them with the 10 prime contractors on the vehicle has also helped push the contract into agencies looking to hit IT modernization goals.

"The conversation with agencies has changed. We're seeing statements of objectives, not statements of work," she said, noting the objectives have an eye towards transforming agency telecom and IT.

Agencies have also faced challenges crafting transition plans from their old telecommunications contracts to EIS by the 2020 deadline, prompting talk among federal IT officials, as well as EIS contractors, to call for an extension.

Ely said a transition extension could be in the cards for some agencies if they put the work into transforming their networks, rather than aiming for a "like-for-like" replacement through EIS.

"We know in the back of our mind that extensions are out there," she said. If agencies go for a traditional, non-transformational approach, Ely said, they can craft that "like-for-like" solution through EIS by the deadline.

The day before the AFFIRM panel on July 26, the GSA inspector general issued a report critical of the agency's Transactional Data Reporting pilot program. The pilot is intended to voluntarily collect pricing data, including prices paid by government customers, for products and services sold under GSA contracts. The data could even out pricing for federal buyers.

The IG report said the pilot's metrics won't allow the agency to accurately measure how TDR data could improve the value of the agency's multiple award schedules. It lacks performance targets, and a majority of metrics depend on data that is not available for use.

The IG recommended GSA set performance targets for each metric used in the pilot and make sure the data is available and accurate.

Thomas said GSA was "appreciative" of the IG report feedback on the 36-month long TDR pilot, saying his agency was only halfway through it. It is "just getting to the point where data can be harnessed" with it. "We may make some tweaks based on the report," he said.

AFFIRM AWARDS GRANTS FOR UNDERREPRESENTED TECHNOLOGY GROUPS; SUPPORTS DIGITAL LITERACY IN STEM CAREERS

AFFIRM Contact:
Kristie Clement, Communications Committee
1-920-284-0977
kristie@hosky.com
www.affirm.org

AFFIRM AWARDS GRANTS FOR UNDERREPRESENTED TECHNOLOGY GROUPS; SUPPORTS DIGITAL LITERACY IN STEM CAREERS

Washington, DC, July 9, 2018 — The Association for Federal Information Resources Management (AFFIRM) is awarding a total of $50,000 in grants to technology institutions for their work in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) and for striving to bridge the digital divide.

“Statistically, there are half as many African Americans and Hispanics in technology as in the rest of the private sector workforce,” said Adrian Gardner, President, AFFIRM.  “And only 20% of technology jobs are held by women across the board. As an association that supports government’s strong diversity and inclusion efforts, AFFIRM has selected five institutions for monetary contributions in light of their impact on technology’s most underrepresented groups.”

 

The five non-profit organizations receiving grants are as follows:

Black Girls CODE: With more than 1.4 million computing jobs expected to be available in the US by 2020, Black Girls Code aims to diversify the computer sciences field with the smarts, talent, and creativity of young women of color, who have been historically underrepresented in STEM careers.  Learn more at http://www.blackgirlscode.com/

Hispanic Heritage Foundation:  Established by the White House in 1987, the Hispanic Heritage Foundation is an award-winning non-profit that identifies, inspires, prepares and positions Latino leaders in the classroom, community and workforce to meet America’s priorities.  Learn more at https://hispanicheritage.org/

UrbanEd: For children, youth and adults in the District of Columbia, UrbanEd provides technology-driven education, information and skill development for sustained futures.  Learn more at https://www.urbaned.org/home.html

Year Up: Working to close the Opportunity Divide, Year Up provides young adults with the skills, experience, and support that will empower them to reach their potential through professional careers and higher education.  Learn more at https://www.yearup.org/

University of Maryland University College Foundation: UMUC primarily serves non-traditional students, who are working adults, veterans and active duty military. Learn more at http://www.umuc.edu/index.cfm

About AFFIRM
The Association for Federal Information Resources Management (AFFIRM) is a non-profit, volunteer, educational organization whose overall purpose is to improve the management of information, and related systems and resources, within the Federal government. Founded in 1979, and based in the Washington, DC area, AFFIRM's members include information resource management professionals from the Federal, academic, and industry sectors.  For more information, go to www.affirm.org and follow @affirmtweets.

###

AFFIRM’s 39th ANNUAL LEADERSHIP AWARDS RECOGNIZE EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE IN THE GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY

AFFIRM Contact:
Kristie Clement, Communications Committee
1-920-284-0977
kristie@hosky.com
www.affirm.org

AFFIRM’s 39th ANNUAL LEADERSHIP AWARDS RECOGNIZE EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE IN THE GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY

Washington, DC, May 10, 2018 — The Association for Federal Information Resources Management announced the government and industry leaders selected to receive the 39th annual AFFIRM Leadership Awards.

The AFFIRM Leadership Awards are among the most prestigious of the Federal community, honoring individuals and teams for their outstanding leadership over the preceding year. First awarded in 1979, award honorees join a prestigious list of agency executives and managers.

The AFFIRM Leadership Awardees will be recognized and honored on Thursday, June 28, 2018 at the AFFIRM Annual Leadership Celebration, an after work reception from 6:00pm to 8:30pm, in the St. Regis Washington, DC. 

Award winners include:

Executive Leadership in Information Technology (Civilian)

Jeff Shilling, NCI Acting Chief Information Officer and Chief of NCI IT, National Cancer Institute

Executive Leadership Award for Industry - Large Business

Marc Mancher, Principal, Federal Strategy & Operations, Deloitte Consulting LLP

Rockstar Rookie

Harold Whitaker, IT Project Manager, Homeland Group, U.S. General Services Administration FEDSIM

Leadership Award for Service to the Citizen and the Country

Adriane Burton, Chief Information Officer, Health Resources and Services Administration

Leadership in Technology Innovation - Team

Maria Roat, Chief Information Officer; Guy Cavallo, Deputy Chief Information Officer; and Sanjay Gupta, Chief Technology Officer, U. S. Small Business Administration

Leadership in Technology Innovation - Individual

Michael Torres, Transformation Strategist - Federal HC Service Strategy Architect, Office of Personnel Management

Leadership In Cyber Security

Carlene Ileto, Executive Director, CDM Products and Services Delivery Management Office; U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Leadership in Mobile Computing Technology

Robert Kayl, Program Manager, Web & Mobile Technology, Solution Delivery Division, Defense Health Agency

Special Recognition -Team

Cyber Innovation Office at Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), Assured Identity, Leading Change with Mobile Assurance and Continuous Multi-Factor Authentication (CMFA), Defense Information Systems Agency

President's Award Public Sector

Dr. Barry C. West, DHS Senior Advisor and Department-wide Senior Accountable Official for Risk Management, U.S.  Department of Homeland Security

President's Award Private Sector

Dan Chenok, Executive Director, IBM Center for The Business of Government

To attend the AFFIRM Leadership Awards Celebration visit www.affirm.org.

The Association for Federal Information Resources Management (AFFIRM) is a non-profit, volunteer, educational organization whose overall purpose is to improve the management of information, and related systems and resources, within the Federal government. Founded in 1979, and based in the Washington, DC area, AFFIRM's members include information resource management professionals from the Federal, academic, and industry sectors. 

www.affirm.org

@affirmtweets

For better cybersecurity, be nice to your CFO

Dereck Johnson
FCW
May 1, 2018

Nearly every federal employee, even those whose IT experience begins and ends at using a computer for work, is capable of contributing to the protection of U.S. government networks.

While CIOs and CISOs bring the expertise and experience needed to manage large IT enterprises, chief financial officers bring money and vision. Their control over an agency's budget requests and strategic planning process makes them gatekeepers whose support can often mean the difference between getting the necessary funding for critical cybersecurity priorities and simply making do.

"Why should I be collaborative with my CFO? That's where the money is," said Rod Turk, acting CIO of the Commerce Department at a May 1 event hosted by the Association of Government Accountants. "And frankly…if you start talking bits and bytes to your CFO, they're not going to understand. When they don't understand, guess what? You don't get the money."

Click here to continue reading this article.